I agree with you. I think that one problem is the deflection from behaviour which is considered to be “normal”.
A woman behaving like men are supposed (”allowed”) to do (go out late at night, drink some alcohol, engaginging in conversations with strangers) and gets raped is to blame for it. If she’s a loving housewife standing in her kitchen and cooking for her husband and her children who will come home from work/school soon gets raped and is rightfully considered to be not responsible (or at least not considered a slut).
Same with men who become victims of sexual abuse since men/boys are not supposed to be victims of this kind of crime. But you know that people love to be ableto put everything in it’s category so that they don’t need to think about it.

Might I ask where I can find more info on this cause I’d sure as heck like to read it?

While the women played a minor role (not fighting in the war or being members of the SS) they were still involved. There were so called “Blockführerinnen” (the pendant to the “Blockführer”). Female supervisors could be observed in camps for women or at least responsible for women. You may use the term “Blockowa” in google. “Blockowa” is the Polish expression for “Blockälteste” who were subordinated to the “Blockführerin”.
Another book is “Camps de Concentration. Crimes contre la personne humaine” or also called “Konzentrationslagerdokument F 321″. This book is a compendium of testimonies from 1945 (for the Nuremberg trials - that’s where it got the designation “F 321″ being evidences RF-331 and RF-333) but i don’t know if it’s available.
There’s also a novel called “The Reader” from Bernhard Schlink but i didn’t read that one.

When are you gonna write some more in your journal dude?

So do you like it?
Well, i didn’t have much free time lately but i didn’t abandon my Blog.