<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Reply to J.T. about Google Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sundrip.com/journal/2006/11/03/my-reply-to-jt-about-google-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sundrip.com/journal/2006/11/03/my-reply-to-jt-about-google-search/</link>
	<description>Sundrip Journals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:44:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverylizard</title>
		<link>http://www.sundrip.com/journal/2006/11/03/my-reply-to-jt-about-google-search/comment-page-1/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>silverylizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundrip.com/journal/2006/11/03/my-reply-to-jt-about-google-search/#comment-778</guid>
		<description>somebody really wrote that to you?! a little more research please, before leaving a comment....?
you certainly handled it well. its actually kind of funny... (schnikker)
kïrstin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>somebody really wrote that to you?! a little more research please, before leaving a comment&#8230;.?<br />
you certainly handled it well. its actually kind of funny&#8230; (schnikker)<br />
kïrstin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keepers</title>
		<link>http://www.sundrip.com/journal/2006/11/03/my-reply-to-jt-about-google-search/comment-page-1/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>keepers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundrip.com/journal/2006/11/03/my-reply-to-jt-about-google-search/#comment-779</guid>
		<description>some people are always looking for something to be offended by, it was obviously funny, at least to keepers and me.

john and keepers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some people are always looking for something to be offended by, it was obviously funny, at least to keepers and me.</p>
<p>john and keepers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGodfather</title>
		<link>http://www.sundrip.com/journal/2006/11/03/my-reply-to-jt-about-google-search/comment-page-1/#comment-781</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGodfather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundrip.com/journal/2006/11/03/my-reply-to-jt-about-google-search/#comment-781</guid>
		<description>J.T. had no reason to go berserk like this. You were not rude in any way and it was not insulting to anyone even if you didn&#039;t grasp the joke (though i doubt it was too hard to understand).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.T. had no reason to go berserk like this. You were not rude in any way and it was not insulting to anyone even if you didn&#8217;t grasp the joke (though i doubt it was too hard to understand).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Velvet Sacks</title>
		<link>http://www.sundrip.com/journal/2006/11/03/my-reply-to-jt-about-google-search/comment-page-1/#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Velvet Sacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sundrip.com/journal/2006/11/03/my-reply-to-jt-about-google-search/#comment-780</guid>
		<description>J.T. must be a new reader who, unfortunately, made some incorrect assumptions.  I think if s/he had read back a little further into your journal, your meaning of the &quot;white woman&quot; comment would have been obvious.  Your regular readers know your heart&#039;s in the right place, and you know it, too, so keep doing what you&#039;re doing, okay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.T. must be a new reader who, unfortunately, made some incorrect assumptions.  I think if s/he had read back a little further into your journal, your meaning of the &#8220;white woman&#8221; comment would have been obvious.  Your regular readers know your heart&#8217;s in the right place, and you know it, too, so keep doing what you&#8217;re doing, okay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.298 seconds -->

