I never would have known there was a school of thought about “objects” unless Marcy said something. It seems that some sort of strong focus is considered and the object like, the object of my desires or the object of my disapproval, of my joy, etc. Now that’s a loose explanation but that’s what I took from how Dr. T explained it. The school of thought is that anything focused on is the object so it wasn’t a slip of the tongue or even his personal belief that woman are sexual objects when he asked me about my “sexual objects”. He was speaking purely from a lingo, technical, psychology standpoint. He said he forgets sometimes that the lingo isn’t universal. He said he was careless in his speech by not being aware that not everyone is familiar with psych schools of thought. I smiled at him because it wasn’t too long ago that I did the same type of thing, assumed others had information that they didn’t have.
He and I have communication errors all the time but it’s not anything new for me. If it only happened with a few people I could say that it isn’t me but since it happens quite often with many different people from all walks of life I have t accept that most of the time the communication errors are on my end. At least this time it wasn’t my fault.
RECENT COMMENTS